[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-16 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:39:35 -0400: On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 19:18 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: Hi Kevin, On 6/15/06, Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the should as implying that all new packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-14 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:52 +, Duncan wrote: But as Stuart Herbert pointed out, a project can be self-authorized, by the current rules. Project Sunrise therefore didn't /need/ permission to come into existence and set up its own overlay. The announcement here, while perhaps it /should/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-14 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:52:37 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | But as Stuart Herbert pointed out, a project can be self-authorized, | by the current rules. Project Sunrise therefore didn't /need/ | permission to come into

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Peter
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:54:47 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:29:55PM -0400, Peter wrote: [snip] This kernel source will not cause Armageddon to arrive, cause smoke to issue from your power supply, nor interfere with other ebuilds. That's funny. Did you just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote: I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the tree, and there is dire warning associated with them. Only the -mm sources have any sort of warning. If a user CHOOSES to use a hacked up kernel, then they obviously choose

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:41:21PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't particularly helpful All software runs on top of the core of the operating system, the kernel. If the kernel is buggy it will be reflected in all the software running

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Grant Goodyear
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: [Tue Jun 13 2006, 01:52:18PM CDT] All software runs on top of the core of the operating system, the kernel. If the kernel is buggy it will be reflected in all the software running on top of it, be it portage, compilers, daemons or graphical user environments. Oh,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:41:21 -0500 Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: [Tue Jun 13 2006, 01:30:27PM CDT] | On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote: | I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the | tree, and there is dire

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:30:27 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote: I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the tree, and there is dire warning associated with them. Only the -mm sources have any