On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um I put it badly, sorry (i've had the flu) - I meant Chris in his
capacity of releng, catalyst etc. You only want to review, np. ++ to
moving ahead.
And if he'd like to do so, I'll be happy to give him access to it.
The
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 04:13 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| and Gianelloni for the infrastructure.
And what on earth do infrastructure have to do with a package manager
specification?
Especially considering that I am not an infrastructure guy. I'll be
honest.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to
worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving.
Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And irrespective
of whether bug-wranglers have much to say, I'd still want them
involved, as they deal with the ebuild bugs. As such they could well
have ideas or viewpoints which would help. Even if they don't, it's
how
