On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 01:05 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
It is my opinion that the news reading application need not be
integrated into portage. As far as I have understood it, the only real
thing that anyone has required portage itself to do is to
*automatically* spit out You have $n
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:39 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
When we have emerge --news done,
I keep seeing references to emerge --news but at the same time am seeing
that news readers are external. What exactly is `emerge --news` meant
On Sunday 13 November 2005 00:34, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:39 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
When we have emerge --news done,
I keep seeing references to emerge --news but at the same time am
seeing that news
Jason Stubbs wrote:
To be honest, this is the part that I don't like the most. Integrating code
into portage to copy files here and there based on some predefined rules and
news readers reading and renaming files based on some predefined rules...
A filesystem based API just doesn't seem very
On 10-11-2005 20:55:37 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Ok, you want a reaction, because you are Feeling Blue[1], right.
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 20:11 +0100, Grobian wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up
for things.
Doesn't
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:03 +0100, Grobian wrote:
On 10-11-2005 20:55:37 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
I am just in the opinion that we lack a system where users can find the
information they need. That would help a certain type of users,
absolutely not all of them. So yes, after that,
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:03 +0100, Grobian wrote:
Ok, you want a reaction, because you are Feeling Blue[1], right.
The only reaction I want is for us to meet the goals that I have set
out, instead of trying to move those goals.
You describe here (and in your diary) the aim to reach 100% of our
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
When we have emerge --news done,
I keep seeing references to emerge --news but at the same time am seeing
that news readers are external. What exactly is `emerge --news` meant to do?
Print out You've got news!? Manage some external
Georgi Georgiev posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:27:47 +0900:
maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types
Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate
no-sync settings on the subdirs)
Remember that $PORTDIR can be shared
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 20:11 +0100, Grobian wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up
for things.
Doesn't matter.
I think it does. I believe that is the root cause of our difficulty in
getting news to our users. We rely on our
John Myers posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:18:33 -0800:
On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:38, Duncan wrote:
I don't believe the apache upgrade issues were announced on the announce
list.
For the record, it was sent to the announce list on 2004-12-24.
Ciaran McCreesh posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:47:47 +:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:38:47 -0700 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| While I agree with the point you make, I don't believe the apache
| upgrade issues were announced on the announce list. The news
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So, what list should the user that wants to receive those
| **important** messages sign up to?
That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up
for things.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML,
[snip]
After going through the list, I got the impression there is simply no
place where such messages clearly would go. gentoo-announce sounds as
the best option to go for, but its description somehow suggests not.
Though, subscribed to gentoo-announce means you get nothing but GLSA
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So, what list should the user that wants to receive those
| **important** messages sign up to?
That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up
for things.
Doesn't matter. If the
[snip]
After going through the list, I got the impression there is simply no
place where such messages clearly would go. gentoo-announce sounds as
the best option to go for, but its description somehow suggests not.
Though, subscribed to gentoo-announce means you get nothing but GLSA
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 14:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
[snip]
After going through the list, I got the impression there is simply no
place where such messages clearly would go. gentoo-announce sounds as
the best option to go for, but its description somehow suggests not.
Though,
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:11:23 +0100 Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Besides that, I see no arguments why users don't. No proof either.
Have a look at how amazingly well certain recent upgrades have gone...
| Forcing a push-based method on someone who likes pull-based methods
| is evil. The
7.11.2005, 20:11:23, Grobian wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So, what list should the user that wants to receive those
| **important** messages sign up to?
That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't
19 matches
Mail list logo
