Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Mon, Aug 7, 2006 at 22:18:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > > > I would call you a horrible administrator since this: > > "I run an update w/o knowing that it downgrades" > > should NEVER happen. > > > > emerge -pv foo > > [ebuild UD] cat/fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I would call you a horrible administrator since this: > "I run an update w/o knowing that it downgrades" > should NEVER happen. > > emerge -pv foo > [ebuild UD] cat/foo-currentversion [downgraded-version] Great. I have to explicitly compare the ver

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Alec Warner
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > My problem still seems unsolved (or did I miss something) ? > > Lets say, if I've, installed foo-1.1, and it gets masked due > some bug(s), but 1.0 isn't, I want to get informed with an big > fat warning, *before* anything actually done, ie. > > [...] > # WARNING: i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
Enrico Weigelt wrote: My problem still seems unsolved (or did I miss something) ? Lets say, if I've, installed foo-1.1, and it gets masked due some bug(s), but 1.0 isn't, I want to get informed with an big fat warning, *before* anything actually done, ie. [...] # WARNING: installed package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Edward Catmur
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 15:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Lets say, if I've, installed foo-1.1, and it gets masked due > some bug(s), but 1.0 isn't, I want to get informed with an big > fat warning, *before* anything actually done, ie. > > [...] > # WARNING: installed package foo-1.1 has been ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Enrico Weigelt
My problem still seems unsolved (or did I miss something) ? Lets say, if I've, installed foo-1.1, and it gets masked due some bug(s), but 1.0 isn't, I want to get informed with an big fat warning, *before* anything actually done, ie. [...] # WARNING: installed package foo-1.1 has been masked

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-04 Thread Duncan
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:32:57 +0200: > Alec Warner wrote: >> Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>> * Duncan schrieb: >>> How can it be too late? You sync during that 30 days it's masked, do an emerge --pretend --update world,