On 6/9/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Firstly, I think it is very clear that anything in sunrise is experimental
or not supported in the main gentoo tree. That's fine! I don't think any
user who goes through the trouble to set up an overlay would miss that
point. You can't go to o.g.o and
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 07:44 -0400, Peter wrote:
> Firstly, I think it is very clear that anything in sunrise is experimental
> or not supported in the main gentoo tree. That's fine! I don't think any
> user who goes through the trouble to set up an overlay would miss that
> point. You can't go to o
On Friday 09 June 2006 13:44, Peter wrote:
> Secondly, my bias against a third party repository is perhaps unwarranted.
> I am sure the bmg site is excellent and the people running it are
> well-intentioned and experienced. However, that said, as a user, I have a
> higher comfort level staying in t
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:44:38AM -0400, Peter wrote:
> Firstly, I think it is very clear that anything in sunrise is experimental
> or not supported in the main gentoo tree. That's fine! I don't think any
> user who goes through the trouble to set up an overlay would miss that
> point. You can't
On Friday 09 June 2006 13:44, Peter wrote:
> And, anyone who
> goes through the trouble to svn the overlay, edit make.conf, etc., would
> not be an ignorant newbie (no disrespect to newbies intended).
I had a bug from an users unable to build kdesktop with gcc 4.1. I built it
fine I told him, and
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:08:01 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:31:43PM -0400, Peter wrote:
>> And, for me again as a user, using a gentoo-hosted overlay is
>> preferable to a third party repository. This is a personal bias on my
>> part -- and maybe unwarranted.
>
>
