[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-20 Thread Steven J Long
Rémi Cardona wrote: Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit : [snip] Steven, This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you try to pick a fight with Ciaran. No I was answering the points he made, specifically he gave the fact that something's not used in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-20 Thread Andrew D Kirch
Steven J Long wrote: Rémi Cardona wrote: Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit : [snip] Steven, This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you try to pick a fight with Ciaran. No I was answering the points he made, specifically he gave the fact that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:13:59 -0400 Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: I think it's clear at this point that Ciaran was the wrong person to have in charge of the PMS or EAPI spec's despite his willingness to do the work.. I tried to talk to him about having Paludis support an extension

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-20 Thread Andrew D Kirch
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:13:59 -0400 Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2. Obviously you don't get it. We aren't going to spend time writing this sort of spurious and unnecessary specification

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:36:30 -0400 Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2. Obviously you don't get it. We aren't going to spend time writing this sort of spurious and unnecessary specification documents. Why not? Are you