Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
If you want a list of *that*, look at 134852. But we were discussing
Jakub's contributions, not Jakub's bad behaviour.
I think this is a much more representative example of Jakub's
Ciaran, Steve,
I think i made it clear this subthread needs to be left alone here and
moved to a better place (if any) as already explained here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48164/focus=48271
So please stop it, both of you.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200
Ioannis Aslanidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's
effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys,
and it's not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:36:09AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
It's not just me that thinks there haven't been any major b0rkages for
nearly a year. Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the development process
has actually worked /better/ since you were forcibly retired?
Can you *please* stop
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:36:09 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip examples of bad behaviour
...does anyone want another few pages of that kind of thing? Devrel
has for once gotten something more or less right. Perhaps people
should be thanking them instead.
You're ignoring the
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:36:09AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200
Ioannis Aslanidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's
effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:36:09 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And from the comments of others, *he gets the result*.
Incidentally, many tried to make that same argument about Ciaran.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This thread is not going anywhere useful, and does not belong on -dev.
There was a request to move it to gentoo-devrel if there was any need to
continue it. Please do that.
Me, I don't see that there's much new ground to cover at this point.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:36 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
And from the comments of others, *he gets the result*.
So what?
We are a community. We cannot allow poisonous attitudes to flourish in
our community, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR CONTRIBUTION.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
On 4/19/07, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:36 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
And from the comments of others, *he gets the result*.
So what?
We are a community. We cannot allow poisonous attitudes to flourish in
our community, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR CONTRIBUTION.
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue surrounding the suspension
of Jakub or you have a problem with the manner in which the issue was
handled/executed. You can reach devrel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and on
their mailing list, [EMAIL
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue surrounding the suspension
of Jakub or you have a problem with the manner in which the issue was
handled/executed. You can reach devrel
I'm afraid to inform you that this was already proposed and was not
taken seriously! :)
On 4/19/07, Larry Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue
Larry Lines wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue surrounding the suspension
of Jakub or you have a problem with the manner in which the issue was
handled/executed. You
14 matches
Mail list logo
