Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:15:56 + Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You wouldn't even be allowed to carry on like that on the forums; why should we users be held up to a higher standard of conduct than devs who sign up to represent gentoo? You really have no idea what's considered perfectly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:15:56 + Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW it wasn't the nature of the insult, it was just that there was an insult at all I didn't see one. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 11/03/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: On 10/03/07, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes (definitely a bad thing). .. OTOH,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Thomas Rösner
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: You really have no idea what's considered perfectly acceptable on the forums, do you? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-1053530.html#1053530 -- acceptable Now *that's* satire. See, on forums you can retract what you said (if you don't get quoted, that is),

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Steve Long
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Andrej Kacian wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600 Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on loads a bugs; if you really