Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-14 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: > Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) > > Joshua Baergen schrieb: >> Sven Köhler wrote: >>> Hmm, xorg-server-1.1* is stable now, but xorg-x11-7.1 is not. Did you >>> forget that ebuild? ;-) >> Sure did! I fixed it a while ago th

[gentoo-dev] Re: X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-14 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Joshua Baergen schrieb: > Sven Köhler wrote: >> Hmm, xorg-server-1.1* is stable now, but xorg-x11-7.1 is not. Did you >> forget that ebuild? ;-) > Sure did! I fixed it a while ago though, so re-syncing now should get > you the r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-13 Thread Joshua Baergen
Sven Köhler wrote: > Hmm, xorg-server-1.1* is stable now, but xorg-x11-7.1 is not. Did you > forget that ebuild? ;-) > Sure did! I fixed it a while ago though, so re-syncing now should get you the right keywords on the meta-ebuild. Joshua Baergen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

[gentoo-dev] Re: X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-13 Thread Sven Köhler
> X.Org 7.1 has been released from its binary driver jail to the > (un?)stable masses! Does it build? Only on Tuesdays! Does it run? > Often! Will it damage your system? I like cheese! Hmm, xorg-server-1.1* is stable now, but xorg-x11-7.1 is not. Did you forget that ebuild? ;-) signature.a