Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:06:58 +0100:
> Duncan wrote:
>> Mainstream kernel's default make install uses /sbin/installkernel if it
>> exists, so I've been using it, invoking the kernel's make install from
>> my own kernel scri
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:20:55 +0100:
> I'd relax, removing from system doesn't make the package automagically
> uninstall for everybody who has it. And running emerge --depclean
> without --pretend, especially on produc
Duncan wrote:
At minimum, I'd say make the usual BIG WARNING NOISES in the usual
places, and probably still expect complaints. It may still be worth
doing to cut down on system size... or not, depending on where the system
size vs. inevitable complaints comes down. (FWIW, it's precisely this
Duncan wrote:
> Mainstream kernel's default make install uses /sbin/installkernel if it
> exists, so I've been using it, invoking the kernel's make install from my
> own kernel scripts. installkernel invokes mkboot...
We (the docs team) have never suggested out users to run `make install`
for v
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 28 Jan
2008 07:23:18 -0500:
> current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
> - installkernel
> - mkboot
> do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
> personally needed/
