[gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename

2008-03-30 Thread Duncan
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700: No need to ban 1.00; it's already banned by PMS- quoting from names.tex: A version starts with the number part, which is in the form \t{[0-9]+($\backslash$.[0-9]+)*} (a positive

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename

2008-03-30 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: | Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted | [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700: | | No need to ban 1.00; it's already banned by PMS- quoting from names.tex: | | A version starts with the number part,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename

2008-03-30 Thread Richard Freeman
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: If you are asking about mathematic stright definition: negative integer: -inf,...,-1 positive integer: 1,...,inf natural: 0,...,inf The group of natural numbers includes the positive integers and zero. That is the definition in most places in the world; however, in the

[gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename

2008-03-29 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
The ebuild howto has been clear on this topic for quite a while: The fourth subsection of the package name is the Gentoo Linux-specific revision number ({-r#}). This subsection, like the suffix, is also optional. # is a non-zero positive integer; e.g., package-4.5.3-r3 Michael Sterrett -Mr.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename

2008-03-29 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ebuild howto has been clear on this topic for quite a while: The fourth subsection of the package name is the Gentoo Linux-specific revision number ({-r#}). This subsection, like the suffix,