Le dimanche 23 août 2009 à 10:24 +, Duncan a écrit :
But at three months, I'd be beginning to consider a reinstall from
stages, tho I'd probably still do the in-place upgrade. But beyond
that,
people are really only making it harder on themselves, and by six
months,
It really depends
William Hubbs posted on Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:52:54 -0500 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 08:39:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
We also need to consider whether people even want it done exactly the
way Portage does it now. Some developers have expressed a preference
for a
Duncan wrote:
William Hubbs posted on Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:52:54 -0500 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 08:39:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
We also need to consider whether people even want it done exactly the
way Portage does it now. Some developers have expressed a
Dale wrote:
While I like your example, if this were to happen and a couple other
things has been updated, like for example expat a while back and other
similar update nightmares, wouldn't a reinstall be easier and most
likely recommended anyway? I have seen this recommended and even made
Andrew D Kirch posted on Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:05:03 -0400 as excerpted:
Dale wrote:
While I like your example, if this were to happen and a couple other
things has been updated, like for example expat a while back and other
similar update nightmares, wouldn't a reinstall be easier and most
Duncan wrote:
Andrew D Kirch posted on Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:05:03 -0400 as excerpted:
Dale wrote:
While I like your example, if this were to happen and a couple other
things has been updated, like for example expat a while back and other
similar update nightmares, wouldn't a
Dale wrote:
I'm just not sure that portage should be s backward compatible as it
appears to be now.
Dale,
It really doesn't have to, unless you're not running portage... in which
case we have to wait on all package managers to implement every major
feature change the others want. The
