On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:43 +, Peter wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
snip
Since you mentioned my name in your e-mail I figured I had something to
do with the delay on your becoming a developer, however, having
consulted bugzilla I find that this is not the case.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 + (UTC)
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a
timely fashion. And, any potential devs would be rather turned off by
the goings on here. You guys seem to try and stifle innovation at
every turn --
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:06:16 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 + (UTC)
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a
timely fashion. And, any potential devs would be rather turned off by
the goings on here. You guys
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
Maybe a recruiting drive to help with the maintenance. A typical
business brings on new blood and assigns them just that role to free up
more senior developers for more complicated projects.
New developers should definitely meet a
