On Thursday 01 June 2006 14:30, Josh Saddler wrote:
Jan Kundrát wrote:
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Summing up:
* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in
piece.
Agreed. I'd like to see much more extensive use of Unicode throughout
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:08:54 +0200
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 20:19, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Summing up:
* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die
in piece.
Would it
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Would it be possible to do automatic detection and unicode conversion in the
portage install stage? I think that would probably be the best option. At a
later stage a simple detection and warning might be sufficient.
Tricky. You can parse a file and check if it's valid
Respectful Gentoo developers,
I would like to ask what do you think about UTF-8 encoded manual pages?
I mean, the files like ls.1.gz, which are used by honorable man program.
Recently I attacked the problem a little and before submitting any
patches/proposals to Gentoo bugzilla I'd like to know
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Summing up:
* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
Any constructive comments are more than welcome!
The very same problem exists with man-pages-cs (which are outdated as a
bonus).
Blésmrt,
-jkt
--
On Thursday 01 June 2006 20:19, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Summing up:
* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
Would it be possible to do automatic detection and unicode conversion in the
portage install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 20:19, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Summing up:
* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
Would it be possible to
