Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-11-12 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Montag, 9. November 2009, Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 16:11 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: Hi there! A late hello, Second point: udev-145 bundles a lot of new extras, but they can only be enabled/disabled all or nothing. These extras are: * udev-acl: Apply

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-11-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 16:11 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: Hi there! A late hello, Second point: udev-145 bundles a lot of new extras, but they can only be enabled/disabled all or nothing. These extras are: * udev-acl: Apply consolekit permissions to devices for users (audio, video,

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-11-09 Thread Daniel Drake
Matthias Schwarzott wrote: Up to now I have just added use-flag extras to control these. But I suppose that udev-acl and maybe gudev is a hard requirement for newer hal or devicekit versions. And upstream thinks these should be enabled by default. I've been playing with Fedora lately and they

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:45 AM, William Hubbswilli...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:16:47PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Matthias Schwarzottz...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How

[gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi there! The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How should the ebuild verify they are met? Some possible ways: 1. Check config under /usr/src/linux 2. Check /proc/config.gz 3. Print message for user in pkg_postinst Second point: udev-145 bundles a lot of new extras,

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Arun Raghavan
2009/8/30 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org: Hi there! The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How should the ebuild verify they are met? Some possible ways: 1. Check config under /usr/src/linux 2. Check /proc/config.gz 3. Print message for user in pkg_postinst All

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Matthias Schwarzottz...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How should the ebuild verify they are met? Some possible ways: 1. Check config under /usr/src/linux 2. Check /proc/config.gz 3. Print message

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Bruno
On Sun, 30 August 2009 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How should the ebuild verify they are met? Some possible ways: 1. Check config under /usr/src/linux /usr/src/linux is not the best place to look at... Checks should

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:16:47PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Matthias Schwarzottz...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How should the ebuild verify they are met? Some possible ways: 1. Check

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Hubbs wrote: I agree here. The eclass should check /proc/config.gz. Also, another reason to use the eclass is it respects KBUILD_OUTPUT if it is set. - From the indenting I can't tell if you wrote this or not, however, we need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 05:05:05PM +0200, Bruno wrote: Is this bound to consolekit or does it rather fall under 'acl' use-flag? I guess this includes a kernel requirement (ACL support for tmpfs) Yes, this would imply CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL to actually be used. * usb-db: Provide udev-rules

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-08-30 Thread Lars Wendler
In summation, I say hard-enable these: acl Please don't do this. It would force installation of sys-apps/acl to any user which I think is not desired by everybody. I'd rather like to see this being enabled by either the acl or the consolekit USE flag. Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) Gentoo