Ben de Groot schrieb:
On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
- considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake,
etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only
E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes
On 15/11/2012 11:45, Thomas Sachau wrote:
ok, so what about ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES as USE_EXPANDED var?
LGTM
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
- considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake,
etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only
E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the confusion harder.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
the next days.
i doubt there will be any objection but with such information
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
the next days.
i doubt there will be any
If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
the next days.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
