Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-18 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:18 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: Bounties sound pretty scary to me. One of Gentoo's enduring qualities is that it is supported by volunteers. Injecting money into the development process will certainly change what problems get attention. I think I like it better when

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Stefan Schweizer
On 5/17/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can help. For example I am using kde but dont read all kde bugs, so if I would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can help.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread R Hill
On 5/16/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of | ricers are interested in rather than the ones

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Heinrich Wendel
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:13, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting

[gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Heinrich Wendel
I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and think it explains things very well. So here is just another call for enabling bug voting on bugs.gentoo.org mfg, heinrich :-) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 May 2005 00:58:45 +0200 Heinrich Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and | think it explains things very well. | | So here is just another call for enabling bug voting on | bugs.gentoo.org What, so that you can see which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heinrich Wendel wrote: I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and think it explains things very well. I blogged [1] about this the other day. It also talks a bit about bounties, which I was actually more interested in. It's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of ricers are interested in rather than the ones that're actually important? once again, voting is optional ... if you dont want to pay attention to them, then dont shut up and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:47:17 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Heinrich Wendel wrote: | I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and | think it explains things very well. | | I blogged [1] about this the other day. It also talks a bit about | bounties, which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of | ricers are interested in rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:47:17 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Heinrich Wendel wrote: | I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and | think it explains things very well. | | I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-16 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | What, so that you can see which