В Вск, 07/02/2010 в 21:24 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that
would be clobbered when the inherit occurred.
epatch() { die you need to inherit eutils.eclass to use epatch ; }
After fixing breakage that was introduced by
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
binaries. Examples of cases where set -e would have helped: 303849,
297063, 260279,
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
binaries. Examples of cases where set
El 07/02/2010, a las 18:19, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org escribió:
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild
environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from
eutils
which compiled and installed
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:19 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine
On Sunday 07 February 2010 16:10:10 Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
binaries.
this is not the
On Sunday 07 February 2010 17:19:43 Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use set -e in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine
Le 08/02/2010 03:24, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
if we wanted to specifically target semi-common errors (and i think 'epatch'
w/out eutils.eclass falls into this category), then a repoman check would be
good.
it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that
would be
