[gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Bryan Østergaard
Hi all. Jon Portnoy (avenj) recently resigned from Developer Relations. In that regard we had a meeting yesterday discussing the various issues from that. The (very) short summary is: 1. We've decided that I'm going to remain as the single devrel lead and that I will appoint assistants if and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:41:52 + Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | 2. There's been some concern that things said in private has been | leaked. You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm shocked, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Michael Cummings
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm shocked, I say, shocked! Yes, that's right, those secret meetings that you can get copies of the irc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:29:14 -0400 Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, | and say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm | shocked, I say,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:29:14 -0400 Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, | and say things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the | logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain | private IRC channel. | | You're just pissy because you weren't invited to the party.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:27:30PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain private IRC channel. It wouldn't make sense to discuss stuff that is restricted to devs/devrel in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:39 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the | logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain | private IRC channel.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 04:30:15PM +, Ferris McCormick wrote: A very few discussions must be private: Consider that except for some documentation and policy, our only product is developers and the interactions among them, really. Now, if we were of one mind, there would be no problem,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Alec Warner
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the | logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain | private IRC channel. | | You're just pissy because you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:41:52 + Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | 2. There's been some concern that things said in private has been | leaked. You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and say things that they don't want other