Hello here,
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Betelgeuse is working on a repoman check for
Jakub Moc wrote:
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Shouldn't it be the reverse? Rather,
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 19:28, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
IOW, it doesn't matter if an ~arch virtual depends on stable packages.
It matters if stable packages depend on an ~arch virtual.
So that's like any other package in the tree..
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello here,
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello here,
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Just
