El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
[...]
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not
catched by preserve-libs as they can be a real
On 06/03/2013 11:49 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
[...]
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
unless Portage can replace targeted --library calls too?
Just saying I'm not
On 06/04/2013 09:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
This is for a ABI change
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's possible to
trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and slot-operators.
Or you could choose a longer-term solution like firebombing the
upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2013 04:56 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's
possible to trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and
On 3 June 2013 01:41, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please review the attached news item which announces the preserve-libs
default for portage-2.1.12. Note that our council has discussed this change
in their 2013-05-14 meeting [1], and they were in favor of allowing it.
[1]
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:41:21PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Please review the attached news item which announces the preserve-libs
default for portage-2.1.12. Note that our council has discussed this
change in their 2013-05-14 meeting [1], and they were in favor of
allowing it.
[1]
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:41:21 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll answer to some parts with what I think the user might think; I
know the answer to most of those, but the user might not.
Beginning with sys-apps/portage-2.1.12, FEATURES=preserve-libs is
enabled by default. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 06:32 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:41:21 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
The news item is good, but I agree with Tom there could be more
questions. Maybe adding a link to some page which explains the
On 06/03/2013 03:32 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:41:21 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll answer to some parts with what I think the user might think; I
know the answer to most of those, but the user might not.
The news item now includes a link to this wiki page
Please review the attached news item which announces the preserve-libs
default for portage-2.1.12. Note that our council has discussed this
change in their 2013-05-14 meeting [1], and they were in favor of
allowing it.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2448/focus=2452
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
