Re: [gentoo-dev] Everyone developer should downgrade back to gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.2

2007-03-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > isnt this what package mask is for ? and/or just put out a quick -r1 that > reverts echangelog > -mike I did package.mask it, but not everyone syncs daily. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Everyone developer should downgrade back to gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.2

2007-03-24 Thread Paul Varner
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 21:56 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Joshua Baergen kirjoitti: > > > It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 > > > produces proper changelogs. > > > > Until the problem is solved everyone should downgr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Everyone developer should downgrade back to gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.2

2007-03-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: > Joshua Baergen kirjoitti: > > It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 > > produces proper changelogs. > > Until the problem is solved everyone should downgrade back to 0.2.6.2. I > package.masked 0.2.6.3 in the meanwhile. is

[gentoo-dev] Everyone developer should downgrade back to gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.2

2007-03-24 Thread Petteri Räty
Joshua Baergen kirjoitti: > > It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 > produces proper changelogs. > > Josh > Until the problem is solved everyone should downgrade back to 0.2.6.2. I package.masked 0.2.6.3 in the meanwhile. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720