On 04/27/12 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
as soon as possible (which likely means in the next EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask and
package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:03:54 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
* two new files in profile directories supported,
package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical to package.use.mask
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
* two new files in profile directories supported,
package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force,
except that the resulting rules are
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
* two new files in profile directories supported,
package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical to package.use.mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/04/12 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful feature,
as soon as possible (which likely means in the next EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree that the ~arch ebuilds should be tested in the same
configuration in which they will end up in arch. However in this case,
the possible configurations for arch are a subset of those in ~arch, so
On 04/27/2012 06:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
* two new files in profile directories supported,
package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and
Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 17:26:48 schrieb Zac Medico:
Maybe I'm missing something, but what would happen when the newest
version of a package is marked stable? The masked USE flags would
become unavailable for everyone?
In order to be practical, I guess we'd have to add a constraint
Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 13:35:21 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
* two new files in profile directories supported,
package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical
Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 16:31:10 schrieb Ian Stakenvicius:
Where this would (have been|be) useful: * we had for a long time
different revisions of subversion with/without kde useflag *
cups-1.4 had the infamous libusb backend triggered by USE=usb *
cups-1.5 has optional systemd support
Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 11:30:57 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
On 04/27/12 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
as soon as possible (which likely means in the next EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask
and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is
Zac Medico wrote:
So, here's a description of the whole algorithm that I'd use:
[snip]
I think the following is equivalent, but simpler and more general since
it doesn't have to mention details like ** and friends that aren't
currently in PMS, and doesn't assume that the rule for handling
On 04/27/2012 12:57 PM, David Leverton wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
So, here's a description of the whole algorithm that I'd use:
[snip]
I think the following is equivalent, but simpler and more general since
it doesn't have to mention details like ** and friends that aren't
currently in PMS,
Dear all,
I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful feature, as soon as
possible (which likely means in the next EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask and
package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and
On Thursday 26 April 2012 18:03:54 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask
and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force,
15 matches
Mail list logo
