On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 23:31 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and
added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version.
Is there a specific reason not to include the inherit eapi[1][2]
thing?
IMHO this would fit best in
O
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:31:47 +0100
From: Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I've spent some time reading all of this years emails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.06.08 16:48, Ferris McCormick wrote:
[snip]
Very small point. There is a difference between EAPI in the file
name
extension and just EAPI in the file name. I think the intent here
is
the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and
added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version.
The HTML version (not with the GLEP style sheet) is at
http://xrl.us/bevrnb (my devspace)
