Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-11 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 20:03 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: B. don't use GNU extensions in pkg_functions and have some way to export them (extract pkg_* functions from environment.bz2). Those can then be used by pre/post script in binary package manager. This is your best bet, but again

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-10 Thread Alec Warner
On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 06:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could

[gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-08 Thread Natanael Copa
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your userland is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild writers. you want a deficient runtime environment, more

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-08 Thread Alec Warner
On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your userland is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-08 Thread Natanael Copa
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 06:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your userland is outside of the