Following the bugzilla upgrade, looks like email is now setting a field
procmail can filter on. so, ah, thanks! 'cause i know this bugzilla
upgrade was all secretly to satisfy me ;)
~mcummings, advocate of saving jforman from further torment without a
good cause, like sheer fun or something
--
Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
related bugs? i should seriously hope this doesn't warrant a glep, more
of a anyone else think it'd be worth asking the security folks about
question. (reason
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
related bugs?
this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
cc-ed the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
related bugs?
this really should have been sent to the security
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:55 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
cc-ed the security team
this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
outcome :P
See, this is my (*cough*lazy*cough*) ignorance shining bright again
Lance Albertson wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
outcome :P
Don't forget about jforman!
The outcome was that Bugzilla Product (here, Gentoo Security)
could/should/would be added as a Bugzilla mail header so that proper
filtering
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
Just a thought as i try to recall where i left that can of coffee,
~mcummings
Chris White
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:37:54AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
didnt know e-mail clients were integrated with bugzilla
oh, they're not, so it's still hard to
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 02:37 +0900, Chris White wrote:
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
Because that does nothing for filtering
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:37:54AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
didnt know e-mail clients were integrated with
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 02:37 +0900, Chris White wrote:
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
Because i'm talking about filtering
11 matches
Mail list logo
