Alin Nastac wrote:
I find active devs metric a useful one.Until a year ago, the number of
active devs was linearly rising, but in last year we seem to hit a ceil
(175) - either recruiter team is understaffed or our organization
reached the maximum number of individuals who can work together
Every now and then someone get sick of Gentoo and suddenly became
prophet, preaching that the end of the distro is near.
I wanted to see how much should we worry about it so I've made a perl
script to find the history of the following characteristics:
- no. of active developers (active dev := did
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:34:49 +0300 Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I am aware those characteristics are quantitative and don't say
| anything about the quality of the distribution.
They're also somewhat skewed, given all the modular ebuilds people are
making of late...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 19:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:34:49 +0300 Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I am aware those characteristics are quantitative and don't say
| anything about the quality of the distribution.
They're also somewhat skewed, given all the
On 07/07/06, Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am aware those characteristics are quantitative and don't say anything
about the quality of the distribution. However, judging after those
graphs, even the worst basher will recognize that we are far from being
dead.
It may be a better
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:53:12 +0100
Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/07/06, Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am aware those characteristics are quantitative and don't say
anything
about the quality of the distribution. However, judging after those
graphs, even the
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
It may be a better metric to look at the bugzilla stats. How has the
number of bugs being filed changed? What ratio of filed bugs are
resolved, vs the ones that are left open? bugs.gentoo.org has some
facilities for graphing stats back to December 2005...
Bugzilla
