Please keep future information regarding this poll public on gentoo-dev or
similar.
[publicising on gentoo-dev with permission from Grant Goodyear]
Dear all,
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
eligible to vote.
The proposals up for vote:
- The FOSDEM
Daniel Drake wrote:
- Form a task force for additional study (Task-Force)
-core mail (7 June 2005) from jstubbs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(will be available on gentoo-dev as a response to this message)
Jason Stubbs' proposal:
I'm past this deadline, but I'd like to propose a modified keeping it
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 16:22 +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers
are
eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Because, if
Paul Waring wrote:
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
This is about how we organize the work between Gentoo
Paul Waring wrote: [Wed Jun 08 2005, 10:22:12AM CDT]
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers
are
eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Feel free, that's
On Thursday 09 June 2005 00:00, Daniel Drake wrote:
- Form a task force for additional study (Task-Force)
-core mail (7 June 2005) from jstubbs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(will be available on gentoo-dev as a response to this message)
Not very patient, were we? ;)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:59:34AM -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
Sorry, I've missed how that's relevant to Gentoo metastructure..?
--
rob holland - [ [EMAIL
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:12:59 +0200
Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do I get votify from?
wopr-mobile ~ # votify
zsh: command not found: votify
wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
Searching...
[ Results for search key : votify ]
[ Applications found : 0 ]
Jim Northrup wrote:
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
Sorry? Usually if the request for voice is polite enough won't be a
problem. Voiced/avoiced people usually are known by developers for
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:59 -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
I hope this was only a misunderstanding / miscommunication.
#g-dev is already quite crowded and not a
Daniel Drake wrote:
We are using dev.gentoo.org to collect ballots this year. The
procedure is as follows:
$ votify --new metastructure2005
Where do I get votify from?
wopr-mobile ~ # votify
zsh: command not found: votify
wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
Searching...
[
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Where do I get votify from?
wopr-mobile ~ # votify
zsh: command not found: votify
wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
Searching...
[ Results for search key : votify ]
[ Applications found : 0 ]
It's
Jan Brinkmann wrote:
It's actually installed on toucan. You have to ssh into
dev.gentoo.org to be able to vote.
Ah, makes sense. Sorry for bothering,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B
13 matches
Mail list logo
