Re: [gentoo-dev] Intentions to remove mail-client/muttng from the tree

2007-05-27 Thread Lars Weiler
* Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/05/26 10:52 +0200]: Current state of muttng is a bit vague. It tries to be a collection of patches against the latest development version of Mutt. I tried to create a muttng-flavoured mutt ebuild out of this patches-collection. Initially I wanted a

[gentoo-dev] Intentions to remove mail-client/muttng from the tree

2007-05-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi all, mail-client/muttng currently sits in the tree as some sort of orphan. It used to be a fork of Mutt, having many patches applied, features added and code cleaned up. However, at a certain point the project died, one of the main developers went back to Mutt and applied his patches there.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Intentions to remove mail-client/muttng from the tree

2007-05-26 Thread Lars Weiler
* Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/05/26 10:52 +0200]: Please speak up now if there are major reasons to keep muttng in the tree, despite being unmaintained and out of date. I'm okay with removing muttng from the tree. Some weeks ago I tested the old mutt again, but unfortunately not all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Intentions to remove mail-client/muttng from the tree

2007-05-26 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: * Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/05/26 10:52 +0200]: Please speak up now if there are major reasons to keep muttng in the tree, despite being unmaintained and out of date. I'm okay with removing muttng from the tree. Some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Intentions to remove mail-client/muttng from the tree

2007-05-26 Thread Wernfried Haas
I think the most important patch is the side bar, which is also available in mutt (thanks so much ferdy) :-) cheers, Wernfried -- Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org http://forums.gentoo.org || http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/proctors/ forum-mods (at) gentoo.org || proctors