On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:24 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:14 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> > > > It has been masked since March 12.
>
> yeah its just about the email. It would be nice if you waited until say,
> Tuesday, 20:00GMT before removal. It will then give those possib
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:14 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> > > It has been masked since March 12.
>
> It was scheduled for removal for a long time, I really think that anyone
> interested in picking it up would have let me know by now.
> Do you want me to wait longer? (I take it this is about the mail
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:05 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote:
> Although I am not interested in looking after this, is 4 hours and 20
> minutes notice enough to claim a new maintainer?
> > It has been masked since March 12.
It was scheduled for removal for a long time, I really think that anyone
inte
Although I am not interested in looking after this, is 4 hours and 20
minutes notice enough to claim a new maintainer?
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 15:38 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> bmp-outlame causes instability with large playlists, and may seriously
> impair BMP's ability to play MP3 files.
> It has be
bmp-outlame causes instability with large playlists, and may seriously
impair BMP's ability to play MP3 files.
It has been masked since March 12.
Should you want to save it, a patch is expected that makes it behave
correctly. If you're a dev, I expect you to maintain this package
afterwards.
If I
