вт, 22 сент. 2020 г. в 07:58, David Seifert :
> No, the original point really stands. The energy we have invested in
> EAPI bumping and what not is in no relation to the actual gain. The ROI
> on leechcraft has been negative, and not just by a small bit. The back
> and forth has been tiring, and
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 07:51 -0500, Georg Rudoy wrote:
> The PR ( https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15938 ) contains
> non-live snapshot ebuilds. Although, indeed, it's been last updated a
> few months ago.
>
> What's ultimately blocking there is splitting the commit adding those
> ebuilds
The PR ( https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15938 ) contains
non-live snapshot ebuilds. Although, indeed, it's been last updated a
few months ago.
What's ultimately blocking there is splitting the commit adding those
ebuilds into multiple commits, one per package, while keeping the tree
I'd also like to point out something regarding "- packages only"; It
may be buildable one day for users, and broken the next. And some of the
deps may be unbuildable, it's really random and up to state of upstream
instead of state of ::gentoo repo. This was the case with leechcraft for
# Michał Górny (2020-09-22)
# Poorly maintained suite of NIH packages. Only live ebuilds left
# for over a year. This really belongs in an overlay. Some of them
# depend on deprecated dev-qt/qtwebkit (#684672).
# Removal in 14 days. Bug #693328.
app-leechcraft/laretz
