Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT=mirror.
Also, I failed to see such
Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 14:09 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
It's enough that loads of games kill
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
This check in this
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:40:47PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
of the license.
No violation here: [...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS
AGREEMENT,
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
of the license.
No violation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the
12 matches
Mail list logo
