On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
language and with software configuration management.
Ulrich
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:32:47AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the
On 03/04/2010 11:35 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:28, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would let the people maintaining the packages in the new category
decide what to call it.
As the primary maintainer for mercurial, hgsubversion and hg-git, I
would prefer dev-vcs.
I wonder, would a Python
On 4 March 2010 10:58, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Nice idea, +1.
I too prefer dev-vcs as the category name.
My thoughts exactly.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
__
Ulrich Mueller dixit (2010-03-04, 10:32):
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
language and
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:35:28 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
And this is why the move wasn't done five years ago: by the time we'd
worked out everything we'd need to do by hand because epkgmove was
broken, the whole thing got bikeshedded to death.
On 03/04/10 10:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
I like the