So, I was working on updating libcaca to 0.99_bea4 version, but there's a new
license to add, and I'd liek to know if anybody has a problem with this ...
http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
--
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, December 2004
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
So, I was working on updating libcaca to 0.99_bea4 version, but there's a new
license to add, and I'd liek to know if anybody has a problem with this ...
http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
--
Diego,
The DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT license is apparently a perfectly
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:16:19 +0200
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody has a problem with this next evening (UTC+2), I'll commit
libcaca-0.99 under p.mask and this license to the licenses directory.
You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone else's
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 02:37, Peter Gordon wrote:
The DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT license is apparently a perfectly valid
(though amusing) Free software license, according to an old post [1] on the
debian-legal list.
I never intended otherwise, but better safe than sorry, I'd rather check
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 03:19, Jason Wever wrote:
You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone else's
opinion but your own :-P
I never said I will consider other opinions anyway ;) But you're probably
right.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
