Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2005 19:10 schrieb Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò:
> I've done the change to nsplugin for media-video apps (gxine, vlc,
> helixplayer and realplayer).
> With that it makes more sense to have it global (5 nsplugin local flags
> just now).
I'll soon update freewrl, which has the sam
On Monday 11 July 2005 18:38, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step?
I've done the change to nsplugin for media-video apps (gxine, vlc, helixplayer
and realplayer).
With that it makes more sense to have it global (5 nsplugin local flags ju
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:04 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:[Tue Jul 12 2005, 11:53:57AM EDT]
> > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:41 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > > Karl,
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts?
> >
> > use nsplugin?
>
> Chris, since when are you Karl?
Chris Gianelloni wrote:[Tue Jul 12 2005, 11:53:57AM EDT]
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:41 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Karl,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > What are your thoughts?
>
> use nsplugin?
Chris, since when are you Karl? :-b
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpDg8M3IkBtQ.
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:41 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Karl,
>
> Diego has mentioned that the nsplugins USE-flag already exists and
> seems to duplicate browserplugin. Additionally it is more appropriate
> since it refers specifically to netscape-compatible plugins, which is
> definitely what t
Karl,
Diego has mentioned that the nsplugins USE-flag already exists and
seems to duplicate browserplugin. Additionally it is more appropriate
since it refers specifically to netscape-compatible plugins, which is
definitely what these are. If there's another plugin format, it
probably shouldn't
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step?
> acroread, gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger,
> mplayerplug-in?
As Aaron points out, mplayerplug-in, mozplugger, netscape-plugger,
netscape-flash and gplflash do not have the m
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 12:38:46PM EDT]
> Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step?
> acroread
makes sense here
> gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger,
> mplayerplug-in?
These are all plugins by definition, there's nothing to do
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:[Mon Jul 11 2005, 03:25:22PM EDT]
> profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape
> compatible browsers
>
> We already have this that is the same at the end.
This looks like the right thing to do instead of the browserplugin
On Monday 11 July 2005 20:56, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> Thus it is probably better for the USE flag to be
> called `mozillaplugin', to allow for the future introduction of other
> browser-specific plugin USE flags.
profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape
c
One issue I see with a `browserplugin' USE flag is that there may at
some point be web browsers in the tree that support plugins that are not
Mozilla-compatible. Although there are multiple Mozilla-compatible
browsers (mainly browsers which use Mozilla code or have Mozilla
embedded), the plugins i
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 18:38 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> I vote for global use flag and useage in all browserplugins.
Yes, I second that.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Am Montag 11 Juli 2005 15:13 schrieb Karl Trygve Kalleberg:
> Hi gang,
>
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow
KarlTK wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 09:13:03AM EDT]
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing
> the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag,
> called 'browserplugin'.
I think I can speak for the mozilla team... this change looks good.
Regards,
Aron
On Monday 11 July 2005 15:13, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Wasn't nsplugin plugin useflag already present?
[Btw I usually don't use it
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:13 +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Yay!
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Meta
Hi gang,
over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
'browserplugin'.
The change means that in order to have continued Java browser plugin
support, you must add the useflag 'browserplugin' to the USE
17 matches
Mail list logo
