On 02/03/2012 03:10 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack
of maintainer. However,
2012/2/2 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack
of maintainer. However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of
maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list
maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the first step in
searching for a new maintainer. (The last being mask and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/02/2012 10:56 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Dear all,
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of
maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list
maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the
On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of
maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list
maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the first step in
searching for a new maintainer.
if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack
of maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list
maintainer-needed@g.o which
