Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Dan Douglas wrote: > This reminds me of Linus' old Google talk on Git in which He said something I have to ask: was the pronoun capitalization intentional? > along the lines of: "Many companies using Git internally don't know they're > using git - they're using i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Dan Douglas wrote: > But ok it's a good point. Github isn't a good central point of contact. People > have to use their discression. It's just uncommon these days for a project as > big as Gentoo to have ultra-centralized corporate-style procedures where > everythi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Dan Douglas
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 05:00:49 PM Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > This gets us into another topic altogether. > > I do believe git pull-requests should go through Bugzilla. A > pull-request is the equivalent to bump requests, patch fixes, and all > sorts of stuff that we already handle through Bugzi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Kent Fredric писал 2012-05-25 01:20: On 25 May 2012 09:14, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: In gentoo git tree all git commits will be signed by commiter gpg keys (and this will be requerd!) Aaron W. Swenson писал 2012-05-25 00:00: Something that still confuses me about commit signing that I haven't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On 25 May 2012 09:14, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: > In gentoo git tree all git commits will be signed by commiter gpg keys (and > this will be requerd!) > > Aaron W. Swenson писал 2012-05-25 00:00: Something that still confuses me about commit signing that I haven't seen answered: How does a signed co

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On 25 May 2012 09:00, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > I do believe git pull-requests should go through Bugzilla. A > pull-request is the equivalent to bump requests, patch fixes, and all > sorts of stuff that we already handle through Bugzilla. Bugzilla also > contains our history. +1 > > If they hap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
In gentoo git tree all git commits will be signed by commiter gpg keys (and this will be requerd!) Aaron W. Swenson писал 2012-05-25 00:00: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/24/2012 03:57 PM, Dan Douglas wrote: Git is about decentralized version control. When you clone a r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver)

2012-05-24 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/24/2012 03:57 PM, Dan Douglas wrote: > Git is about decentralized version control. When you clone a repo, > you have your own "fork". When everyone has their own branch, > everyone is effectively equal. So yes you can expect much much > more f