-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Martin Rud Ehmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> I don't see how this is going to make anything easier to maintain.
>
> Well, it's not the overlay, but the clean subtree'ing what does
> the trick. If you look at the whole de
* Martin Rud Ehmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> I don't see how this is going to make anything easier to maintain.
Well, it's not the overlay, but the clean subtree'ing what does
the trick. If you look at the whole dependency graph, this subtree
is an really independent part, just if it w
hmm, I'm just thinking about splitting the tree into separate
(larger) parts, actually: move out certain subtrees to an overlay.
For example: KDE.
Many people/systems won't ever use it (ie. have no X at all).
Others are very interested in it.
If we had this whole subtree in an overlay, it wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> hmm, I'm just thinking about splitting the tree into separate
> (larger) parts, actually: move out certain subtrees to an overlay.
>
> For example: KDE.
> Many people/systems won't ever use it (ie. have no X at all).
> Others
* Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
hi,
(I'm trying to splitt off sevaral sub-topics to get them
more clear ...)
> I initially provided an ebuild for a package I maintain. I also
> provide a new ebuild for every new version. For this, proxy
> maintainership is the thing to do, IMO.
