# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (09 Aug 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Removal of dev-libs/libowfat because it fails to build (bug
# #272507) and lacks a proper Gentoo maintainer. Dependencies
# follow the mask.
#
# sys-process/minit is already masked for removal
#
# net-misc/slidentd
dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
with gcc-4.4 and/or sending your bug report upstream.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Diego E. Pettenòflamee...@gmail.com wrote:
# Diego E. Pettenņ
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com said:
dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
with gcc-4.4 and/or sending your bug report upstream.
If it doesn't build with gcc-4.4, it better go sooner rather than
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Mark Loeserhalc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com said:
dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
with gcc-4.4 and/or sending your bug report upstream.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:20:59 -0500
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Mark Loeserhalc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com said:
dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
complained about in the bug installed on amd64,
