Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have
Le vendredi 04 juillet 2008 à 07:07 +0200, Hans de Graaff a écrit :
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
I am, and Marius said all the
Jeroen Roovers kirjoitti:
-
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I don't mind as I don't have the time to follow upstreams that closely
for the hundreds of Java packages out there.
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi fellow developers,
it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Hi fellow developers,
it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be grateful).
Carsten has a cut-and-paste message
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
They are useful as reminder.
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
version bump requests?
I won't prevent anybody to send them, but I can understand why people
would
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:26:13 +0100
Tony \Chainsaw\ Vroon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for
example), it does tend
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
Just an idea:
How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
welcome?
It's more of an individual developer preference, but that seems the right
place for it.
If used, what about including and
Hi fellow developers,
it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be grateful).
Carsten has a cut-and-paste message that he posts in comments to
version bump bug reports that he finds have been
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for example),
it does tend to annoy me when people try their utmost to file bug
reports before I commit my ebuild.
Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
The time I can spend
trawling upstream sites for new releases is limited.
Same here - I would never mind getting a 0-day bump request, since
someone else might have noticed before I did that a new version is
available.
Just an idea:
How about a metadata.xml tag
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
version bump requests?
Just an idea:
How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
welcome?
It's more of an individual
On Friday 04 July 2008, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
welcome?
People obviously don't care about what it says on the website, why should they
start looking into metadata.xml?
I think we should remove the useless
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I guess like with most people it depends
a) If I'm already aware of the new version, or would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
| -
| 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
|
|
It's generally fine with me; though I would handle it differently
depending upon the situation.
For example, sometimes these version bumps
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have said. :-)
One of the reasons that it depends is
16 matches
Mail list logo
