Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On L, 2011-11-26 at 12:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Hello folks, Attached is a short news file announcing the unmasking of GNOME 3.2 with a link to the upgrade guide. Since GNOME 3 is already in the tree, and the news file content is straightforward, I'd like to commit this in 24hrs if

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On L, 2011-11-26 at 12:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: A question: it currently restricts only on the basis of If-Installed, but is there a workaround for the absence Display-If-Visible filter? If there isn't, I'll commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/26/2011 10:55 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On L, 2011-11-26 at 12:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: A question: it currently restricts only on the basis of If-Installed, but is there a workaround for the absence

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: GLEP 42 refers to GLEP 22, which says nothing of ~arch specifiers. The current portage code literally compares the news item's keyword to the current profile's ARCH variable, so ~arch specifiers will not match. The code is

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
Hello folks, Attached is a short news file announcing the unmasking of GNOME 3.2 with a link to the upgrade guide. Since GNOME 3 is already in the tree, and the news file content is straightforward, I'd like to commit this in 24hrs if there are no problems. It can also be found here: