I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that
they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
YES!! Please.
Ben
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
+1
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already
handles it right).
That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose
it for EAPI 4 if you want that.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
2009-08-12 20:41:30 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a):
Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
This
Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are
