On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:42:44PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:39:26 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-r* is an ebuild convention; upstream (exemption of older daft portage
releases) doesn't use it, as such we define it; should define it as
simple as
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:42:44PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:39:26 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-r* is an ebuild convention; upstream (exemption of older daft portage
releases) doesn't use it, as such we define it; should define it as
simple as
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:39:26 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-r* is an ebuild convention; upstream (exemption of older daft portage
releases) doesn't use it, as such we define it; should define it as
simple as possible without castrating it's use.
So to you having to understand
субота, 21. жовтень 2006 01:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ви написали:
[...]
I'm writing to ask for your opinion on a change to sys-apps/portage that
would allow users to maintain local revisions of ebuilds, such as
net-www/apache-2.0.58-r2-local1.
[...]
Um, I am not clear on what exactly your
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:26:00PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:05:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
In designing an enterprise infrastructure around Gentoo at my place of
employment, I have discovered a feature that would improve Gentoo's
Instead of -rY-localX, I do -rX0Y the following in my local overlays.
This gets the same effect and maintains both version numbers. And if
you are worried about a revision number exceeding 99, then just do
-rX00Y. This works without requiring code change to portage.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:51:19 + Philip Walls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| This argument here can also be applied to the -r#.# solution you
| mentioned, so I think the decision between -r#.# and -local# is really
| just a matter of aesthetics. I'm on the fence as to which is best.
The -r#.#.#.#
Simon Stelling wrote: [Sat Oct 21 2006, 09:27:24AM EDT]
This only assures that your version will be preferred as long as the
version number is the same, but is really not what malverian is after.
true.
--
Joel Martin (kanaka)
Open Source
no BILL . no GATES
Costs nothing
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
Joel Martin wrote:
Instead of -rY-localX, I do -rX0Y the following in my local overlays.
This gets the same effect and maintains both version numbers. And if
you are worried about a revision number exceeding 99, then just do
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:27:19PM +, Philip Walls wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:34:08PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:51:19 + Philip Walls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| This argument here can also be applied to the -r#.# solution you
| mentioned, so I
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:35:06 +0200 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Still have the issue with the = operator though, not sure which way
| to go there:
The = operator (without a *) shouldn't ever be used in ebuilds or
profiles. Not using the ~ operator is asking for disaster...
--
Ciaran
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:40:45 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:35:06 +0200 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Still have the issue with the = operator though, not sure which way
| to go there:
The = operator (without a *) shouldn't ever be used in
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 09:35:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:31:31 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be aware that if you reuse the vercmp logic, you're getting the
special case float comparison rules, meaning 1.02 is less then 1.1 in
comparison...
Hello all,
In designing an enterprise infrastructure around Gentoo at my place of
employment, I have discovered a feature that would improve Gentoo's
usefulness greatly in this field.
I'm writing to ask for your opinion on a change to sys-apps/portage that
would allow users to maintain local
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:05:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
In designing an enterprise infrastructure around Gentoo at my place of
employment, I have discovered a feature that would improve Gentoo's
usefulness greatly in this field.
I'm writing to ask for your opinion on
15 matches
Mail list logo
