Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
commit it to the tree.
Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
commit it to the tree.
Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
commit it to
Maxim Koltsov schrieb:
Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
last question: is it good to add versions for all ebuilds too?
I don't think there is a need for a new category. But I do think it is
2011/7/22 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org:
But I do think it is
good to have live ebuilds in portage, especially for fast moving
applications.
I think they can be useful for any application as long as they're
maintained. I can see the value of the QA policy that they must be
* Alex Alexander schrieb am 22.07.11 um 13:30 Uhr:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's
