Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:57:57 PM EDT Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in > the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, > which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather > comprehensive.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread David Seifert
On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 02:57 +, Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in > the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, > which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather > comprehensive. That's

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 20:48:44 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > The "easy" workaround is to use `dev-perl/Gentoo-PerlMod-Version`, and > have it munch upstreams version into a "gentoo normalized version", and > then use that version for comparison. Actually, on that note, it *might* be of benefit to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:40:17 +0100 Alexey Sokolov wrote: > Another comment, unrelated to the new features: RESTRICT="test? > (test)" probably shouldn't trigger the T symbol the same way as > RESTRICT="test" does. +1. This presently has bothered me, because it basically means with the roll-out

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:57:57 + Max Magorsch wrote: > - all outdated packages (according to repology) Unfortunately for Perl, repology can't be taken verbatim. There's a really fun problem with Perl versions, so I'll link you to our writeup to explain it:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Alexey Sokolov
It's great, thanks! I was confused at first at two different buttons "Pull requests", one showing them inline, one going to github, and two different buttons "Bugs", one showing them inline, one going to bugzilla. Sources of data seem to be inconsistent: https://i.imgur.com/PM138E2.png Well, to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:57:57 + Max Magorsch wrote: > Additionally, there are new sites for all package maintainers, that is: > - Gentoo Projects (e.g. pyt...@gentoo.org) > - Gentoo Developers (e.g. la...@gentoo.org > - Proxied Maintainers (e.g. la...@the-cow.de) Some other thoughts

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:57:57 + Max Magorsch wrote: > I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in > the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, > which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather > comprehensive. That's why I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-07 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Am July 8, 2020 2:57:57 AM UTC schrieb Max Magorsch : >Hi all, > >I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in >the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, >which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather >comprehensive. That's why I

[gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-07 Thread Max Magorsch
Hi all, I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather comprehensive. That's why I am looking forward to feedback here. So the tl;dr is that