> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> | We had skipped allocation for 492 and 493, because they're used for
> | oprofile and oidentd in Archlinux, and we have these packages too.
Anyway, stunnel is 341 now, and 492 is (provisionally) reserved
for oprofile.
Ulrich
signature.asc
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>>
>> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
> I give up! How am I supposed to know what to choose if it isn't
> requested in the uid-git.txt file?
On 12/8/19 2:59 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>
> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
>
> Ulrich
>
I give up! How am I supposed to know what to
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/8/19 2:53 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
>> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
>> uid-gid.txt file, so I
On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
> uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
>
> Speaking with
Hi everyone,
I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
Speaking with mgorny on #gentoo-dev, he suggested that we start simply
making a
