Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

2012-03-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-03-2012 11:35:43 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 3/12/12 11:27 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > My rsync0 now spits out this message: > > > > Virtual package in package.provided: virtual/shadow-0 > > See portage(5) for correct package.provided usage. > > > > I did not forsee this ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

2012-03-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/12/12 11:27 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > My rsync0 now spits out this message: > > Virtual package in package.provided: virtual/shadow-0 > See portage(5) for correct package.provided usage. > > I did not forsee this happening, but each and every Prefix user now gets > this complaint on ea

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

2012-03-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-03-2012 10:16:12 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 3/8/12 2:23 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > And then convert profiles to the new virtual (the relevant files; below > > are all occurrences of sys-apps/shadow): > > Because of no comments, I went ahead and checked in > sys-apps/harde

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

2012-03-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/8/12 2:23 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > And then convert profiles to the new virtual (the relevant files; below > are all occurrences of sys-apps/shadow): Because of no comments, I went ahead and checked in sys-apps/hardened-shadow and virtual/shadow, and now made changes in profiles/ Ple

[gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

2012-03-08 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
I'd like to add to the tree. It is an alternative implementation of shadow utilities (passwd, su, login, etc) based on ideas from Openwall's tcb. Earlier I tried upstreaming the Openwall's shadow patches, and you can see a log of those efforts at