On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:40:17 +0200
"Jakub Moc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh... It for sure did sound like 'oh noes, the end of the world is
> near if we don't stop this immediately!!!111!'. Sorry, but I really
> fail to see the need to use such procedures when the only 2 remaining
> packages (
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:12:49 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction
> against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place
> *BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:22
Cia
On 4/25/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction
against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place
*BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution.
Actually, nevermind. I digress. You're right. The Counci
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:12:49 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction
> against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place
> *BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution.
Mmm, no, what's weird is that yo
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 08:55 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> On a general note - if you are unable to agree upon an acceptable
> solution, then better refrain from taking 'emergency' measures on
> issues where there's no emergency whatsoever. There's been a bug open
> for over two months and noone ever su
Quoting Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
noone ever suggested that I'd be a case for
urgent council decision.
That's because your "revisions" only change once a year. ;-)
(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Best regards, Wulf
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 4/25/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jurek Bartuszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:08:49 +0200:
>> Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this:
>>
>> _rc2-rMMDD
So then to cure that we end up with this:
_rc2-rMMDDrr, w
Jurek Bartuszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:08:49 +0200:
>> Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this:
>>
>> _rc2-rMMDD
>>
>> Portage will update from _rc2 to a version with revision part > 0.
>
> However, _rc2-rMMDD-r1 wou
