Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2017-05-24, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > [...] >>> Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread nunojsilva
On 2017-05-24, Michał Górny wrote: > On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote [...] >> Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for comment...". What I'm >> asking is for such proposed changes to be posted on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 24 May 2017 14:21:13 +0900 Benda Xu wrote: > 2. Useful discussion are diluted from 1 list into 2 lists. I think dilution is the point, but the problem is not useful discussions. Its the useless ones that are targeted for dilution, so that the useful ones can stop

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Michał Górny
On śro, 2017-05-24 at 14:21 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Michał, > > > Name: gentoo-dev-internal > > > > Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors > > Basically I object to this proposal. > > 1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-23 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Michał, > Name: gentoo-dev-internal > > Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors Basically I object to this proposal. 1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit organization like us. 2. Useful discussion are diluted from 1 list into 2 lists.