[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007

2007-11-06 Thread Mark Loeser
Hanno Boeck (hanno) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: hanno 07/11/06 01:01:35 Modified: 4Q-2007 Log: move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages Revision ChangesPath 1.10 profiles/updates/4Q-2007 file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007

2007-11-06 Thread Doug Klima
Mark Loeser wrote: Hanno Boeck (hanno) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: hanno 07/11/06 01:01:35 Modified: 4Q-2007 Log: move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages Revision ChangesPath 1.10 profiles/updates/4Q-2007 file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007

2007-11-06 Thread Petteri Räty
Mark Loeser kirjoitti: What are other people's feelings on using package moves to forcibly migrate people like this? It also sounds like this wasn't announced at all and the packages just left the tree. Using package moves like this causes for example the following problem. If you now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007

2007-11-06 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:15:12 -0500 Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to get a wider audience involved in this...this just seems wrong to do. There is a QA bug open about it as well: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198248 What are other people's feelings on using package